Which model consists of nine steps to assess hazards?

The Formal Hazard Assessment Model is the correct choice because it is specifically designed to provide a structured framework for identifying and assessing hazards in a systematic way. This model typically consists of nine steps that guide safety professionals through the process, ensuring comprehensive evaluations are conducted across various environments and activities.

The nine steps often include defining the scope of the assessment, identifying potential hazards, analyzing the risks associated with those hazards, and implementing control measures. Additionally, this model emphasizes documentation and continuous review, which are essential for maintaining workplace safety and adapting to new information or changes in working conditions.

In contrast, the Site-Specific Hazard Assessment Model tends to focus more on the specific conditions of a single work site rather than providing a generalized framework applicable across different contexts. The Risk Assessment Model may not necessarily define a fixed nine-step process, as it's more about evaluating risk in specific situations rather than adhering to a comprehensive sequential method. Lastly, the Health and Safety Model, while important in overall safety strategies, does not specifically center on a nine-step assessment like the Formal Hazard Assessment Model does.

Understanding the structured approach of the Formal Hazard Assessment Model helps safety professionals effectively pinpoint hazards and implement necessary safety measures, ultimately fostering a safer working environment.